In the 1900's, Parker used to be one of the brands to beat, with amazing
pens - coveted to this day - like the Vacumatic, Duofold, and the Iconic
Parker 51 (the latter actually making its return soon!). But the market has
changed since then, and nowadays, Parker is no longer in the prominent
position they once had. Especially among pen enthusiasts and collectors,
their modern pens receive fairly little attention - understandable, as
Parker has been focused on the low-to-mid tiers (like the quintessential,
Parker Jotter), and especially recently directed their focus at a
business-y 'young professionals'-type of audience. The really iconic
models from back in the day are mostly gone nowadays, with the exception of
the Duofold (which I reviewed HERE), although it seems to remain more in the background.
That's not a knock on Parker's business model, it just shows that they
cater to a different, wider audience, not just the more avid enthusiasts
like me and you. In fact, it's Parker's status as
'that one pen brand everyone knows' that makes their entry- and
mid-level pens quite interesting to review. After all, pens like the Jotter
and Parker IM are so prevalent, chances are that these have been, or will be, the
gateway pen into the hobby for a lot of beginning pen
enthusiasts!
So let's take a look at the Parker IM, then. These pens were sent to me
for review by Parker themselves. This model has been a fixture within Parker’s collection,
with surprisingly little changes throughout the 10+ years of its
existence. The IM today, still looks and feels very familiar to the IM I
used to write with in high school back in 2009 or '10.
The design of the IM represents a fairly simple and straight shape, with subtle tapers towards the chunky, unadorned finials that end in a flat top.
The ballpoint mimics that design for the most part, down to the 'center band' that breaks up the transition from the straight barrel towards the strongly tapered, glossy plastic section. Parker went through a complete rebranding a few years ago, and that brought along a few minor changes to the design, such as the two thin lines in the center band, but mostly saw the introduction of new colorways and finishes.
The most prominent change to the IM is the separation of the collection in two distinct tiers: the standard versions, and the 'premium' versions. While the IM that I had in high school (I lost it, unfortunately) had a brushed metal section (thus making it a fully metal pen), the standard IM now comes with a plastic section with plastic threads. Credit where credit is due: the plastic section shows no injection moulding marks, and is nicely polished. But the threads look like they could be a weak point in the design, and show some wear from threading into the metal barrel threads after a while. If you want a metal section, you have to bump up to one of the Premium finishes. The Premium IM looks quite different from the regular versions, finished with a geometric pattern engraved on the cap and barrel, it has a bit more, ehm, 'pizzazz'... but also comes at a rather substantial uptick in price. I'd keep my recommendation with the more subdued finishes of the standard versions.
The design of the IM represents a fairly simple and straight shape, with subtle tapers towards the chunky, unadorned finials that end in a flat top.
The ballpoint mimics that design for the most part, down to the 'center band' that breaks up the transition from the straight barrel towards the strongly tapered, glossy plastic section. Parker went through a complete rebranding a few years ago, and that brought along a few minor changes to the design, such as the two thin lines in the center band, but mostly saw the introduction of new colorways and finishes.
The most prominent change to the IM is the separation of the collection in two distinct tiers: the standard versions, and the 'premium' versions. While the IM that I had in high school (I lost it, unfortunately) had a brushed metal section (thus making it a fully metal pen), the standard IM now comes with a plastic section with plastic threads. Credit where credit is due: the plastic section shows no injection moulding marks, and is nicely polished. But the threads look like they could be a weak point in the design, and show some wear from threading into the metal barrel threads after a while. If you want a metal section, you have to bump up to one of the Premium finishes. The Premium IM looks quite different from the regular versions, finished with a geometric pattern engraved on the cap and barrel, it has a bit more, ehm, 'pizzazz'... but also comes at a rather substantial uptick in price. I'd keep my recommendation with the more subdued finishes of the standard versions.
In general, the IM is a very business-appropriate pen. The design is sober
and unobtrusive, and the different colorways (with the exception of the more
elaborate Premium finishes) are mostly subtle and dark tones that would work
well in any professional environment. In that regard, Parker caters
perfectly to its target audience, but perhaps they're not exciting enough
for real pen-addicts? Talking about finishes, the pens that were sent to me
are part of the latest 'Achromatic' collection. In their effort to modernize
the brand, these black and grey matte finishes with sleek black PVD trims,
fit right in. The black-on-black Achromatic is my personal favorite, for a
very modern and unassuming look.
L to R: TWSBI Eco, Faber-Castell Loom, Pilot Metropolitan,
Parker IM ballpoint, Parker IM fountain pen/rollerball, Lamy
Safari, Lamy 2000, Lamy Studio |
From the size comparison shots, it shows that the IM is not a particularly
large pen - at least the fountain pen and capped rollerball aren't. With a
capped length of just 13.7 cm/ 5.39", and 11.8cm / 4.65" uncapped (the
rollerball is a few mm longer when uncapped, measuring 12cm/ 4.73"). The
section isn't too long and allows your grip to move forward towards the
nib, which makes it a bit less obvious that the pen is really quite short.
In this instance, posting the cap is actually a very valid way to create a
more full-sized pen (although it may scratch the matte finish of the
barrel in the long run). Posting transforms the IM into a 15.4cm/6.06"
long pen, which is comfortable and not too long, and the balance remains
very centered in the hand. The section is on the thinner side, tapering
down to just 9mm/ 0.36" towards the front. It does transition quite nicely
into the barrel, with a minimal step that's not at all bothersome in my
grip.
The ballpoint is a slightly different story, as it isn't particularly
small at 13.6cm/ 5.36" closed, and 13.8cm/ 5.49" open, the barrel has a
comfortable diameter a little over 11mm/ 0.44", though it tapers down
rapidly if you hold it closer towards the front.
The fountain pen and rollerball weigh 26 and 31 grams, respectively. The
ballpoint is the lightest, weighing in at 23 grams total. That's not too
heavy for mostly metal pens. But considering their smaller footprint, it's
enough to make the IM feel solid and durable. Fit and finish are excellent
on all pens. Two minor remarks I found: specifically on the all-black
version, the matte black coating on the cap and barrel does tend to wear
near the edges, showing the brass base material underneath. And the
ballpoint has a slight rattle inside the mechanism when it's deployed, but
it isn't too audible while writing.
The IM (fountain pen and rollerball) have a snap-cap. I've always liked
how the cap of my old IM closed, and I'm happy to see that it still has
that nicely damped and smooth action when you put the cap on, with a
muffled but reassuring *clack* at the end. The cap sits on tight and
secure, and there's no play or wobble to it.
The fountain pen uses Parker's proprietary refills, and
requires a pretty expensive converter (not included) if you want to use bottled ink. |
On the writing end, the capped rollerball (far left), and ballpoint (far
right), are pretty much what-you-see-is-what-you-get. Parker obviously
knows how to make a decent refill, and so both write quite well. The
rollerball lays down a consistent, crisp, dark black line on good
quality paper (rollerball refills have a tendency to feather on cheaper
copy paper). The blue, 1.0mm ballpoint refill is also fairly
standard-issue, with a line that's not as dark as I'd maybe like, but
it's at least fairly consistent and writes without blobs or stutters.
For the ballpoint, I'd be tempted to swap it out for a Parker-style gel
ink refill, such as Parker's own gel refill - as I prefer gel ink over ballpoint.
The most interesting here is of course the fountain pen, so let's take a little more time to talk about that. First of all, the nib on the IM has seen quite a drastic change in shape and styling, coming from the narrow, almost tubular nib designs that Parker used to use on their lower-end offerings (The 2009 example on Parkerpens.net - a fantastic reference for old Parker models - shows what the old nib used to look like). This current version of the IM has a more normal, flared-out nib shape, and the three arrow-shaped lines engraved on the nib face offer a modern look that matches the rest of the IM's clean and simple design.
The nib - while larger than the old-style nib - is noticeably small (not uncommon for pens in this price range) but does perform exactly the way it should. The steel, black-coated nibs are nails and don't provide much character. Line widths run true to western sizes, but unfortunately, the IM only comes with F or M nib options. The nibs offer just a little feedback and are smoother than I expected (Black coatings usually add some 'texture' and create a bit more feedback). Ink flow is nicely balanced and keeps up without fault. More importantly, I was pleasantly surprised by the sheer reliability of this pen. The nib doesn't seem to dry out at all, even after a couple weeks of not being in use - I’m pleasantly surprised.
The most interesting here is of course the fountain pen, so let's take a little more time to talk about that. First of all, the nib on the IM has seen quite a drastic change in shape and styling, coming from the narrow, almost tubular nib designs that Parker used to use on their lower-end offerings (The 2009 example on Parkerpens.net - a fantastic reference for old Parker models - shows what the old nib used to look like). This current version of the IM has a more normal, flared-out nib shape, and the three arrow-shaped lines engraved on the nib face offer a modern look that matches the rest of the IM's clean and simple design.
The nib - while larger than the old-style nib - is noticeably small (not uncommon for pens in this price range) but does perform exactly the way it should. The steel, black-coated nibs are nails and don't provide much character. Line widths run true to western sizes, but unfortunately, the IM only comes with F or M nib options. The nibs offer just a little feedback and are smoother than I expected (Black coatings usually add some 'texture' and create a bit more feedback). Ink flow is nicely balanced and keeps up without fault. More importantly, I was pleasantly surprised by the sheer reliability of this pen. The nib doesn't seem to dry out at all, even after a couple weeks of not being in use - I’m pleasantly surprised.
The Parker IM is a no-nonsense pen, in a way that I'd perhaps come to
expect from Parker. The design is inoffensive, business-appropriate, and
- if I'm being critical - almost a bit unremarkable, if it weren't for
the Achromatic color scheme that adds a modern and sleek look. I really
don't have anything to complain about these pens though. They do what
they're supposed to do, which is perhaps the most important aspect of a
pen in this low-to-mid-tier price range!
The Parker IM ballpoint, rollerball, and fountain pen retail for
28€/34$, 37€/45$ and 50€/61$ respectively (at our site sponsor Penworld, use discount code 'pencilcase' for 10% off your order!).
While that's substantially more than I remember paying for my original
IM fountain pen back in 2010, I think it's not an outrageous price,
although it shouldn't be any higher (the Premium IM is an additional
30$, which is simply too much to justify for a metal section and
different finish). It may be difficult for the Parker IM to stand out
from the crowd in a price range where there's a lot of serious
competition from pens like the Faber-Castell Loom, Lamy Lx, or even something like the more affordable TWSBI Eco, but that doesn't make the IM any less of a valid option to look into.
Now, for the GIVEAWAY...
Enter the Rafflecopter Widget below for your chance to win a full set of
Parker IM Achromatic pens in black: one fountain pen (medium nib) + one
rollerball + one ballpoint (total value 140$!). The prize in this
giveaway is generously provided by Parker. Participating is simple: all you have to do for a chance to win, is
enter in the Rafflecopter widget below and complete one or more tasks,
easy peasy! The more tasks you complete, the more chances to win! This
giveaway will run for one week, starting today.
RULES: Open worldwide! Giveaway ends 17/1/2021. The winner will be
chosen at random, and announced in a separate post. The winner will be
contacted directly via email, if he/she fails to reply within one week,
a new winner will be picked. Only entries with a valid email address are
eligible to win. Invalid entries are denied. Giveaway open worldwide,
but please note that shipping times will depend strongly on the
destination, due to COVID restrictions.
This product was sent to me by Parker so I could write this review. I was in no way influenced in the
making of this review, the opinions shared in this review are
completely my own! This post does not contain affilate links.
I love my PenBBS 469 Double Nib Fountain Pen!
ReplyDeleteNamisu Nova - incredible build quality for the price. Love mine. Thanks for the giveaway. Stay safe.
ReplyDeleteno fav
ReplyDeleteCool to see some new Parker offerings and get your perspective. Thanks for the thoughtful review.
ReplyDeleteI think these are very sophisticated-looking pens!
ReplyDeleteMy favourite sub-$100 pen would be either the Karas Kustoms INK, or just about any ebonite pen made by Ranga Pens (preferably with JoWo-compatible nib unit and cartridge converter). Such great value for money!
ReplyDeleteKaweco Al Sport
ReplyDeleteMy first for was a my Mum's Parker Lady. I've moved on but remember it kindly.
ReplyDeleteNice objective review as ever. Have a bit of the "baby duck syndrome" with Parker as Parker 45 with gold nib was my high school pen, and I've been hooked ever since. Been a bit disappointed with more recent offerings at the lower end, but good to see they're still meeting the market need and staying current. Would have preferred a matte section, but I'm sure some product manager did their research and I'm in a minority...
ReplyDeleteCool! Favorite <$100 pen is probably the Kaweco Sport... in plastic, AL, brass, or steel.
ReplyDeletePenBBS 456 or something vintage
ReplyDeleteLove my TWSBI eco! Was also oddly super impressed by Dryden designs from Amazon. Great giveaway glad to have found yall!
ReplyDeleteVery nice review! Personally, I don't have a favorite pen, I like them all so much! This set will definetely enter my top 10!
ReplyDeleteKind Regards
Willem
I really like my TWSBI eco in a medium nib although as of lately I'm feeling myself drifting towards finer nibs so I might have to purchase a Fine at some point. :)
ReplyDeleteMy favorite sub-$100 pen is the Karas Kustoms Ink. I am excited to see their new v2 rollout to improve on the original design.
ReplyDeleteMy high school fountain pen was a Parker 25 - too bad I got separated from it somewhere along the way. I still write with a stainless Parker jotter ballpoint though!
ReplyDeleteLamy Safari with OM nib
ReplyDeleteLamy LX, TWSBI Diamond 580 and I do love my Noodler's Ahab despite the need to fiddle with it.
ReplyDeleteI really like the classy look of the IM.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite pens under $100 are Lamy CP1, Lamy Scala, LIY Future (with Schmidt nib unit), and I also second another commenter's recommendation of PenBBS 469, which is a very underrated pen.
ReplyDeleteVery nice review and I fully agree with your comments. I am however very curious about Parker's reiteration of the 51!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comprehensive review. I am a big fan of old Parkers, having collected quite a few Vacumatics, Parker 51s, and even Striped Duofolds. However, I have not explored most of their modern pens. So this review is helpful. However, in this price range, I'd probably go for the TWSBI ECO and the Lamy Safari. Known reliable, good writing pens.
ReplyDeleteHey, I just recently realized the notion that pens are an intricate way to connect personally with the ideas that we write. Along with my search of the ideal tool for myself, I have come across Waterman. Furthermore, I understand that they are owned by the same company as Parker, and they do not have the same prestige they once did. Nevertheless, could you do a review of the Waterman Expert or any other Waterman pen for that matter? Thanks for the opportunity to kickstart my pen journey with a Parker pen set!
ReplyDeleteMy favourite sub 100 dollar pen has to be the Pilot Metropolitan. Even though it has little storage for ink in the con 20, it has to be the best bang for buck.
ReplyDeleteMy favourite sub 100 dollar pen has to be the Pilot Metropolitan. Even though it has little storage for ink in the con 20, it has to be the best bang for buck.
ReplyDeleteMy favourite sub 100 dollar pen has to be the Pilot Metropolitan. Even though it has little storage for ink in the con 20, it has to be the best bang for buck.
ReplyDeleteHaha, I don’t have any pens greater than the cheapest, so my favourite pen is the platinum preppy.
ReplyDeleteIt’s got to be the LAMY Safari!
ReplyDeleteIt’s got to be the LAMY Safari!
ReplyDeleteI will always stand by the TWSBI Eco
ReplyDeleteI will always stand by the TWSBI Eco
ReplyDeleteOh it's sounds good
ReplyDelete